The Blood and its Third Element is Béchamp’s explanation of his position, and his defense of it against Pasteur’s mischief. This final major work of Béchamp’s embodies the culmination of his life’s research. This book contains, in detail, the elements of the microzymian theory of the organization of living organisms and organic materials. It has immediate and far reaching relevance to the fields of immunology, bacteriology, and cellular biology; and it shows that more than 100 years ago, the germ, or microbian, theory of disease was demonstrated by Béchamp to be without foundation.
There is no single cause of disease. The ancients thought this, and Béchamp proved it and was written out of history for his trouble. The relevance of his work to the dilemmas that plague modern medical science remains as yet unrealized.
This was the first book I ever published. Way back in the early 1990s, I read a photocopied version of the text, and I realised straight away how important it is. This was confirmed when I read Bechamp or Pasteur? by Ethel Hume. That’s another fine book. It demonstrates exactly what a deceptive scumbag Pasteur was, and how he plagiarised and distorted Bechamp’s work. It’s shit that Pasteur won the battle for the public’s attention — it was purely because he was better at playing politics and sucking up to the rich and powerful than Bechamp was. I went on to publish Hume’s book as well…
The technology for printing books back in the early 90s was quite different from the heavily computerised and automated process which we now take for granted. There was no “print on demand” then, no CreateSpace or Lightning Source. A friend of mine owned an offset press, and after I’d laid out the pages using an early version of Pagemaker, we printed what seemed to be endless piles of pages, which we then collated by hand. We printed a thousand copies, all of which were bound and then trimmed by hand. Yes, things were a bit different back then…
Introductory and Historical
— On the nature of fibrin isolated from the clot or obtained by whipping the blood.
— The blood fibrin.
— Fibrinous microzymas.
— Fibrin and oxygenated water.
— The ferment of fibrin.
— On the actual specific individuality of the albuminoid proximate principles.
— The albuminoids.
— The albuminoids of the fibrin.
— The albuminoids of the serum.
— Haemoglobin. Haemoglobin and oxygenated water.
— The state of the fibrin in the blood at the moment of venesection.
— The fibrin without microzymas.
— The haematic microzymian molecular granulations.
— The real structure of the red blood globule.
— The microzymas of the blood globules.
— The blood globules in general.
— The real nature of the blood at the moment of bleeding.
— The living parts of the blood protoplasm.
— The unchangeable character of mixtures of proximate principles.
— The vitellin microzymas and the blood globules.
— The vascular system.
— The real chemical, anatomical and physiological meaning of the coagulation of the shed blood.
— Coagulation of the blood.
— The blood of the horse.
— The serum of the blood.
— Coagulation of blood diluted with water.
— Second phase of the spontaneous alteration of the blood in calcined air.
— Oxygen has no share in the destruction of the globules in the defibrinated blood.
— Spontaneous alteration of flesh. Spontaneous alteration of milk.
— Fermentation of the egg.
— Spontaneous destruction of the cellule of yeast.
— Spontaneous destruction of tissues.
— Spontaneous alteration of the blood.
— The blood is a flowing tissue and therefore spontaneously alterable.
— Pasteur and the germs of the air.
— Robin and the alteration of the blood.
— Microzymas and spores of schizomycetes.
— Microzymas and micrococcus.
— The microzymas and the circulatory system.
— Comparison of the microzymas of the blood, the circulatory system, and other tissues.
— Autonomy of the microzymas.
— The microzymas and bacteriology.
— Ovular and vitellin microzymas.
— Microzymas and molecular granulations.
— Geological microzymas.
— Biological characteristics of microzymas.
— Microzymas and their perennity.
— Microzymas and pathology. Phagocytosis.
— Microzymas and anthrax. Microzymas and disease.
— Microzymas and microbes.
— Microzymas and the individual coefficient.
— Microzymas, life and death.
— Microzymas, blood and protoplasm. Conclusions.
A medical pioneer far ahead of his time
“Though the 19-Century terminology seems clumsy at times, what Dr. Béchamp is describing is a foundational concept. According to his experiments and observations, these tiny particles he named “microzymas” have an active role in sustaining and also in terminating life. Using the syllable “-zyme” (now also used in the word “enzyme”) to indicate this principle of causing ‘fermentation’ (activity) Béchamp searched for and found the same particles and activity even in limestone, apparently from the ancient shelled creatures whose bodies were incorporated into the stone. They still retained their activity. The only factor that stopped these particles was heat. As Dr. Béchamp expressed it, “Life is the prey of life”: i.e. as the organizing life-principle of a complex body ceases to operate, the microzymas take up their role of breaking it down and returning its elements to nature to be taken up by other life forms.
Unfortunately Pasteur first tried to steal Béchamp’s work, then when he objected, Pasteur set out to use his political clout to destroy the career and reputation of the great French doctor. This is why we don’t hear much about this alternative school of science. A complete history of this scientific and political conflict was written early in the 20th century, by a woman doing meticulous research into the historical records of the French Academy of Science. Please look up “Bechamp or Pasteur?: A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology” by Ethel D. Hume. (Her book is another must-read for grasping the significance of this concept and why certain interests wanted it deleted from the scientific record.)
The same discovery of tiny active particles was repeated in the 20th century, first by Royal Rife using a very complex microscope to observe the particles changing into four different types. Later, working independently and with a different powerful microscope of his own invention, the French scientist Gaston Naessens observed these particles morph into sixteen different forms including bacterial and fungal. The significance of this is that what we think of as pathogens are not necessarily “infectious” (or “exogenous”, or from outside), but can be “endogenous” (from within).
Christopher Bird’s detailed account of this concept which has been named “pleomorphism” — and which is still being attacked by the chemical-based medical authorities — is in his very instructive book “The Persecution and Trial of Gaston Naessens: The True Story of the Efforts to Suppress an Alternative Treatment for Cancer, AIDS, and Other Immunologically Based Diseases”. Like E.D. Hume, the late Christopher Bird was fluent in French, and attended the French-language trial in Quebec. A version of this story in French is titled “Le Galilée du microscope” (Galileo of the Microscope). In reference to the infamous behaviour of Galileo’s critics who refused to look into his telescope, the critics of Naessens refused to look through this powerful microscope that could resolve images in angstrom resolution without first killing or staining the samples.
As the science of “psychoneuroimmunology” begins to gain traction in clinical practice, I entertain the hope that the role of the endogenous (driven by the psyche) aspects of dis-ease will become more respected. (For a detailed account of that field of understanding I’d recommend reading Dr. Gabor Maté’s book When the Body Says No (also in print).) Then perhaps Béchamp may be restored to the status he deserves as a medical pioneer far ahead of his time.”
“I am loving this book! I thought when starting class “Oh great, a hard book to read” but it has totally surprised me, and I am now having a hard time putting it down! Great read for any one just looking to learn more about the body and blood and how things work.”
“This is an excellent book for knowledge seekers who do not take anything at face value. It is not an easy-read book but if you take the time to read and re-read you will gain valuable information that can strengthen your knowledge about the human body and all its elements especially the blood. I highly recommend this book for those wishing to expand their health related knowledge base.”